“We have got to give tax breaks to billionaires” – Bernie Sanders in a mocking tone [1]
I was watching a part of Bernie Sanders’ 8 hour filibuster the other day when this quote struck me for a number of reasons, the most obvious being “why does a billionaire need a tax break?” — an issue that I feel baffles anyone. While this is an interesting topic, my gripe has to do with what Republicans are doing to specifically hurt the middle class, and there is plenty, but for the purpose of this article, I will only focus on a few things.
The first and most obvious is that Republicans do not want to lower taxes on the middle class, but only on the rich. (The middle class just gets thrown in occasionally.) A perfect example of this is that Republicans originally opposed the Payroll tax cuts. Democrats had to compromise on this tax CUT, which would have helped the middle class. We all know that Republicans love to lower taxes, but now they are showing who really matters to them, the wealthy. Then to pay for these tax cuts for the rich, the Republicans want to cut money for Federal agencies and necessary spending. [2] This necessary spending includes programs like medicare, social security, and other services that people use and need every day. Imagine a life where the elderly died of starvation and hypothermia just because the rich wanted more money. Of course, defense spending was virtually untouched. [3] The biggest example of this “Republicans want to protect the rich” mindset is the estate tax. Republicans fought tooth and nail to lower this tax on the richest of the r
ich, because we all know that they need more money. They make it sound like this “death tax” will affect everyone in America, but the reality is that the benefits from changing the Estate tax will only affect 3/10 of the top 1% of Americans [1]. In addition to that, the estate tax in general will only affect people making over $5 million. What really upsets me is that Republicans claim that they are angered by the deficit and current living conditions of Americans, but then turn around and propose HUGE tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans. So much for the middle class.
The Republicans are completely opposed to extending unemployment benefits to the people who need them most during this recession. They only way that Democrats were able to keep these necessary benefits was by allowing Republicans to cut taxes for the rich, especially with the Estate tax. [4] In short, Republicans are telling the helpless, unemployed Americans that if their few rich friends do not get what they want, then millions of people will go hungry. Paul Krugman says it best by calling this Republican strategy “blackmail” [5]. This hardly seems like a fair deal for the majority of Americans, aka the middle class, who are the ones suffering at the hands of Republicans.
So all of the tax cuts that Republicans propose for the rich, which will not do anything for the economy (I will write an article about this as soon as I can),
will drive up the deficit. This means that I, and everyone else here at NewPolity, will have to pay for the deficit that our government is creating. The national debt is projected to be $17.1 trillion ten years from now, a debt that we, the next generation will have to pay. [6] If we agreed with the manner in which this deficit was to be increased, then we might not have as much of a problem with it, but we do not. Tax cuts on the wealthy do not help the economy during recession. Cutting social services is akin to throwing a senior out on the streets to survive by himself.
Finally I leave you with this thought of Bernie Sanders’. “Last year Exxon Mobil made $19 billion in profits and the company paid $0 in taxes but still got $156 million refund from the IRS.” Right now, Republicans want to allow Exxon to make even more money and continue to be exempt from the laws that govern the middle class. How is this fair?
To read Co-editor in Chief Thomas Cayden’s rebuttal to this article, click here.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Sources
[1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tq1zpHF0J04&feature=related
[2] http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703395904576025891398302076.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_5
[3] http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/12/the_lesson_of_the_tax_deal_and.html
[4] http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/07/us/politics/07cong.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=payroll%20tax&st=cse
[5] http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/06/opinion/06krugman.html?partner=rss&emc=rss
[6] http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547492725871998.html
4 Responses to Republicans: Fighting Against the Middle Class
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Our Newest Articles
See What Other Readers are Saying




[...] read Co-editor in Chief Andrew Soluk’s original article, click here. Tagged with: bush tax cuts • Democrats • middle class • President Obama • [...]
[...] A line by line rebuttal to Cayden’s rebuttal “Republicans Fight for Every Class” in defense of my previous article “Republicans: Fighting Against the Middle Class.” [...]
Well, then again, couldnt the same be said for the democrats? I mean yes the republicans are wrong for protecting the wealthy, but the democrats are just as guilty for RAISING taxes on the middle class in order to fund worthless causes that ensure “equality” and allow many people who do not work and are on welfare to just take the middle classe’s money and use it to their own benefit without working any harder (if any) and just keep having more babies and getting more free health care and money
Confident in my national family, I wait for the emergence of a Democrat leader. I do not mean the middle of the road realist who calculates the best chance of winning elections. I mean the individual unafraid to lose.
I wait for the individual who presents a voice that cuts to the essence of the Democratic theme. Come what may, this voice will not waiver, never retreat except to achieve more than it yields.
I wait for a Democrat who is squarely ensconsed in the worker’s interest. Who is it that will call forth in us the old themes of yore? Where is the voice that calls for recognition that corporations are established to support the people, not the other way around?
I feel the pendulum is madly swinging beyond all reason in favor of these bullies who define strength by “making the hard decisions” that hurt the weak and the poor.
Do any of you really think that Social Security ought to be shaped and “amended’ by persons who never, ever will rely on its provisions?
Millionaires will not recongnize the single parent’s concerns over retirement. That worker who sets the alarm a half hour earlier so that he or she can have a moment alone over a cup of coffee before getting the children off onto the bus and driving to work. That worker who takes two ibuprofen because his or her feet still ache from the day before, so that he or she may perform at a job he or she hates, for an employer who hates him or her, considers him or her to be a “cost to be contained.”
That worker who, when setting down the cup looks to rosy fingered dawn over the mountain, raises the eyes and asks, “please, give me strength .. to make it to sixty-five.”
Move the target on this worker? Shift the payday another two years or so? You have got to be kidding. Unconscionable. Not from my national government. Not from the United States of America.
Where is Franklin Delano? Where is Abraham? Lyndon? Hubert?
“Anyone here seen my old friend John?”
Respectfully submitted,
Charles Bailey